Saturday, June 10, 2006
Rollbar Support Structure: F-416 & F-417
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fb90/4fb9056f409eefeb55e020e307df1f3810cffd35" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fe33/1fe33361ad4b66e8bbd7abc58087fd7687459724" alt="Posted by Picasa"
In the first picture I have assembled the F-417 and replaced the canopy rail F-416. I have then offered up the 12"*1"*1" angle. The problem is that according to the plans about 1/3 of the angle should be behind the canopy rail. Even at the front nearly a quarter inch is sticking out.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a80ee/a80eee775815f4ccaf2846032c2bae17d2032f7a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fe33/1fe33361ad4b66e8bbd7abc58087fd7687459724" alt="Posted by Picasa"
In the second picture I have added a .063 shim to the F-407 bulkhead before attaching the F-417. The fit is now better, though none of the angle will fit behind the canopy rail. It will be just about flush at the front.
My question is what have I done wrong, or is it a figment of VANS imagination that about 1/3rd of the angle will be behind the canopy rail when slid into place?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1ec5/b1ec56d916be11c3e20d1fd362d12a3ff99eb7a7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fe33/1fe33361ad4b66e8bbd7abc58087fd7687459724" alt="Posted by Picasa"